Study shows widespread self-censorship in philanthropy in the US

A recent report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) shows a troubling trend among foundations in the United States: widespread self-censorship in response to political pressure from the Trump administration.

The NCRP examined nearly 800 foundation websites, comparing archived versions, using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, with current content to identify changes made since the beginning of Donald Trump’s second term.

The study ‘Hiding in Plain Sight: Are foundation website changes masking their values, or pulling off their masks?’ found:

  • 73% of foundations remained silent in the face of increasing political attacks on democratic norms and marginalised communities.
  • 8.3% of foundations altered their websites, removing or rephrasing language related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Examples include:
         - 'Black, Brown and all people of colour' changed to 'All people.
         - 'Equity and Diversity' replaced with 'Building social capital.'
         - 'LGBTQ+ youth' rebranded as 'Youth initiative.'
  • These foundations represent a significant portion of philanthropic giving - 20% of annual foundation giving and 25% of giving to marginalised communities.

The report also identified a defiant minority:

  • 8% of foundations publicly opposed the administration’s policies.
  • 11% actively mobilised resources to support affected communities.

While some organisations have chosen silence or self-censorship to avoid political retaliation, others have taken a stand, emphasising the importance of defending democratic values and the rights of marginalised groups.

A broader pattern of political pressure

The NCRP’s findings align with trends observed in Europe, where cultural institutions, including museums, are increasingly facing political scrutiny and pressure. NEMO’s Barometer on political influence in museums in Europe, launched to document such developments, has revealed similar patterns of self-censorship, funding threats, and interference in curatorial independence.

These pressures pose a serious challenge to the cultural sector’s role as a space for critical reflection, inclusion, and democratic engagement. As the NCRP report underscores, silence in the face of authoritarian tendencies can inadvertently reinforce them.

To help museums in challenging times, NEMO has launched a resource hub to support independent museums.